Fimo

Compare Fimo: Three categories, one question: who runs the site after launch?

Webflow
vs Fimo
Framer
vs Fimo
Storyblok
vs Fimo
Cursor
vs Fimo

A headless CMS stores the content. A coding agent writes the code. A builder hosts the site. After launch, all three wait for someone to come back. Pick the one you are coming from.

headless cms

A CMS that also has the site's code.

A headless CMS stores your content and stops there. Fimo stores it the same way, and also has the site's code: it hosts the site, previews changes before they go live and runs agents on it.

Storyblok vs Fimo

Contentful is next.

coding agents

They build the site. Something has to run it.

Claude Code, Cursor and Codex write the code, then wait for the next prompt. Fimo takes the project from there: a CMS over its content, hosting with a preview per branch, and agents on a schedule.

Cursor vs Fimo

Claude Code is next.

website builders

Your code, not their platform.

A builder keeps the site inside its platform, canvas and runtime included. Fimo works on the site's code itself: real framework code you and your coding agent can optimize freely, and take anywhere.

Webflow vs FimoFramer vs Fimo

Lovable and Replit are next.

Fimo is not the tool that builds your website. It is the one that runs it afterwards.

Each row is about the category. Named products get their own page.

headless cms
Editing a page
headless cms In a separate admin app, fetched by the site over an API.
Fimo On the page itself. Click the text, the link or the image.
What it can reach
headless cms Your content, through its API. The pages that render it are someone else's job.
Fimo Your content and the site's code, so it can add a page or update one, not just fill in fields.
After the content is in
headless cms Nothing moves until a person logs back in.
Fimo Agents run on a schedule and bring back work to review.
coding agents
Building the site
coding agents They write the code from a prompt, in your editor.
Fimo It can, from the chat, but that is not where it adds value. Your coding agent builds it, installs the Fimo skills and deploys the first preview.
A marketer changing a word
coding agents Open the project, prompt the agent, review the diff, deploy.
Fimo Open the site in Fimo, click the word, type, publish. No code, no prompt.
Work that repeats
coding agents A developer runs the same prompt again each time: SEO pass, translations, refresh.
Fimo An agent: a goal file and a schedule in the repo. Each run lands in a branch with a report, preview and diff for a person to merge.
website builders
Where the site lives
website builders In their canvas and their runtime. Export is limited.
Fimo In a repository you own, as Next.js, Astro, Svelte or React Router code.
Changing the design
website builders Drag it on the canvas. Faster, and nobody technical needed.
Fimo Through the chat or your coding agent, then reviewed like any change.
Hosting and publishing
website builders Included, tied to the platform the site was made in.
Fimo Included. Every change gets a preview, then an explicit publish.

Spot something wrong? Tell us at hello@fimo.ai and we will fix it.

in every comparison

What stays the same.

Real framework code with a git history you can clone and take anywhere

Marketers edit text, links and images on the page itself

Agents are files in the repo: a goal, a schedule and permissions

Every run gets its own branch, a report, a preview and a diff

A person reviews and publishes. Nothing reaches the site on its own

Next.js, Astro, Svelte or React Router, with any coding agent

Server-rendered pages, so search and AI engines get real HTML

Free to start, usage based, never priced per seat

questions

Before you pick a page.

Yes. Content is stored in Fimo and edited on the page or through structured fields, like any headless CMS. The difference is scope: Fimo also has the site's code, so it hosts the site, previews changes before they go live and runs agents on it.

No. Claude Code, Cursor and Codex build the site. Fimo takes the project they produced and owns what comes after: editing, hosting, previews, publishing and the agents that keep the site current.

Once it exists as code. A site inside a builder has to be rebuilt first, as a Next.js, Astro, Svelte or React Router project, usually by a coding agent. Connecting that project takes minutes.

The one you are coming from. Choosing a CMS: Storyblok. An agent built your site: Cursor. Weighing a builder: Webflow or Framer.

Not day to day. Editing content, reviewing an agent's work and publishing happen in the interface. Bringing the site in and changing its design go through the chat or your coding agent.

Most tools in these categories charge per seat, per editor or per site. Fimo is free to start and metered on what you run, with Pro at $149 a month. Adding a teammate does not change the bill.
keep reading

Or start with the product.

What the agents actually doSEO, internal links, translations and content refresh, each on its own schedule.
Pricing, without the seatsFree to start, usage based, and what the Pro plan includes.

Fimo is free to start.

Bring the site your coding agent built and have an agent running before anyone asks for a budget.

Try Fimo for free